Return to search results   -   Start a new search   -   The consultation period for this application has now closed

Planning Application: N6/2008/1376/TE




TREE WORKS ESTATE MANAGEMENT
Decided - Refused
Landscape Dept
222 Handside Lane Welwyn Garden City AL8 6TD
REMOVAL OF SILVERY BIRCH
522753
212028


100080976391
31/07/2008
31/07/2008
L C FUNG
L C FUNG
222 HANDSIDE LANE WELWYN GARDEN CITY AL8 76TD
222 HANDSIDE LANE WELWYN GARDEN CITY AL8 76TD

There are no constraints associated with this application

Deemed Refusal
07/08/2008
07/08/2008
Delegated

To download a selection of individual documents place a tick alongside each of the relevant rows and then click on Download selected files. To download all of the documents place a tick in the box alongside the header row and all of the files will be selected, then click on Download selected files. To view individual documents click on the File for the required row.

File Description Date Uploaded
Decision Notice
File: 343691.pdf (54 kb) Description: Application--Decision Notice (DMS Info Document: 343691 Page No(s).: 1) Created Date:
Site Plan
File: Application--Site Plan.PDF (1739 kb) Description: Application--Site Plan (DMS Info Document: 343690 Page No(s).: 1,2) Created Date:

There are no consultees associated with this application

There are no neighbours associated with this application

Application Number Proposal Decision Distance
6/2024/1364/EMT Removal of Oak tree (T1) to ground level. Granted 0
6/2024/1334/EMT 1 x Silver birch to reduce by approximately 2.5m height and 1.5m in width. Excessive Growth Over Neighboring Boundaries: The Silver Birch tree has exhibited substantial lateral growth, extending over two neighboring properties. Both neighbours have complained about the overhang, debris and potential for branches to fall into their gardens. Impact on Neighboring Trees and Vegetation: The excessive spread of the Silver Birch tree is significantly affecting the form and health of a neighboring apple tree. The overshadowing and competition for light and resources have led to the apple tree developing a poor and unbalanced form, which could result in its eventual decline if not addressed. We acknowledge that our previous application for a more severe reduction of the Silver Birch tree was refused last year. Based on the feedback received, we have reassessed the situation and are now proposing a specification that aligns with appropriate arboricultural practices Granted 0
6/2024/1333/TC 1 x Silver Birch to reduce by approximately 2.5m height and 1.5m in width due to substantial lateral growth No Objection 0
6/2023/0997/TC T1 x Silver birch to reduce by 4m in height and 2m in width Objection 0
6/2023/0996/EMT 1 x Silver birch to reduce by 4m in height and 2m in width Refused 0
W6/2006/0397/EM FORMATION OF VEHICLE HARDSTANDING Refused
W6/2004/1554/EM REPLACEMENT OF FRONT GARDEN HEDGE WITH 0.9 METRE WOODEN PICKET FENCE Refused
W6/2003/0522/EM ERECTION OF A SINGLE STOREY REAR EXTENSION Granted

There are no NMAs associated with this application