Return to search results - Start a new search - The consultation period for this application has now closed

Planning Application: W6/2004/1554/EM

Application Type ESTATE MANAGEMENT	Status Decided - Refused
Case Officer Mr M Davies	Case Officer Email
Location 222 Handside Lane, Welwyn Garden City, AL8 6TD	Proposal REPLACEMENT OF FRONT GARDEN HEDGE WITH 0.9 METRE WOODEN PICKET FENCE
Easting 522760	Northing 212026
Ward Handside	Ward Members Councillor Gemma Moore Councillor Michal Siewniak Councillor Anthony Skottowe
Parish	UPRN 100080976391
Date Received 18/10/2004	Date Valid 18/10/2004
Advert Expiry Date	Public Consultation Expiry
Site Notice Expiry Date
Agent FUNG KAM CHEUNG	Applicant FUNG KAM CHEUNG
Agent's Address 222 HANDSIDE LANE HERTFORDSHIRE AL8 6TD	Applicant's Address 222 HANDSIDE LANE HERTFORDSHIRE AL8 6TD

There are no constraints associated with this application

There are no documents associated with this application

There are no consultees associated with this application

Address	Date Sent	Expiry Date	Date Reconsulted	Reconsult Expiry Date
224 HANDSIDE LANE WELWYN GARDEN CITY HERTFORDSHIRE AL8 6TD	19/10/2004	09/11/2004
220 HANDSIDE LANE WELWYN GARDEN CITY HERTFORDSHIRE AL8 6TD	19/10/2004	09/11/2004

Application Number	Proposal	Decision	Distance
6/2024/1364/EMT	Removal of Oak tree (T1) to ground level.	Granted	0
6/2024/1334/EMT	1 x Silver birch to reduce by approximately 2.5m height and 1.5m in width. Excessive Growth Over Neighboring Boundaries: The Silver Birch tree has exhibited substantial lateral growth, extending over two neighboring properties. Both neighbours have complained about the overhang, debris and potential for branches to fall into their gardens. Impact on Neighboring Trees and Vegetation: The excessive spread of the Silver Birch tree is significantly affecting the form and health of a neighboring apple tree. The overshadowing and competition for light and resources have led to the apple tree developing a poor and unbalanced form, which could result in its eventual decline if not addressed. We acknowledge that our previous application for a more severe reduction of the Silver Birch tree was refused last year. Based on the feedback received, we have reassessed the situation and are now proposing a specification that aligns with appropriate arboricultural practices	Granted	0
6/2024/1333/TC	1 x Silver Birch to reduce by approximately 2.5m height and 1.5m in width due to substantial lateral growth	No Objection	0
6/2023/0997/TC	T1 x Silver birch to reduce by 4m in height and 2m in width	Objection	0
6/2023/0996/EMT	1 x Silver birch to reduce by 4m in height and 2m in width	Refused	0
N6/2008/1376/TE	REMOVAL OF SILVERY BIRCH	Deemed Refusal

There are no NMAs associated with this application