Return to search results - Start a new search - The consultation period for this application has now closed

Planning Application: W6/2003/0522/EM

Application Type ESTATE MANAGEMENT	Status Decided - Granted
Case Officer Mr M Davies	Case Officer Email
Location 10 Melbourne Court, Welwyn Garden City, AL8 6LL	Proposal ERECTION OF A SINGLE STOREY REAR EXTENSION
Easting 522755	Northing 212093
Ward Handside	Ward Members Councillor Gemma Moore Councillor Michal Siewniak Councillor Anthony Skottowe
Parish	UPRN 100080981557
Date Received 10/04/2003	Date Valid 10/04/2003
Advert Expiry Date	Public Consultation Expiry
Site Notice Expiry Date
Agent C BYRNE,	Applicant C BYRNE,
Agent's Address 10 MELBOURNE COURT HERTS AL8 6LL	Applicant's Address 10 MELBOURNE COURT HERTS AL8 6LL

There are no constraints associated with this application

There are no documents associated with this application

There are no consultees associated with this application

Address	Date Sent	Expiry Date
11 MELBOURNE COURT WELWYN GARDEN CITY AL8 6LL	15/04/2003	06/05/2003
9 MELBOURNE COURT WELWYN GARDEN CITY AL8 6LL	15/04/2003	06/05/2003
220 HANDSIDE LANE WELWYN GARDEN CITY AL8 6TD	15/04/2003	06/05/2003
218 HANDSIDE LANE WELWYN GARDEN CITY AL8 6TD	15/04/2003	06/05/2003
222 HANDSIDE LANE WELWYN GARDEN CITY AL8 6TD	15/04/2003	06/05/2003

Application Number	Proposal	Decision	Distance
6/2024/1334/EMT	1 x Silver birch to reduce by approximately 2.5m height and 1.5m in width. Excessive Growth Over Neighboring Boundaries: The Silver Birch tree has exhibited substantial lateral growth, extending over two neighboring properties. Both neighbours have complained about the overhang, debris and potential for branches to fall into their gardens. Impact on Neighboring Trees and Vegetation: The excessive spread of the Silver Birch tree is significantly affecting the form and health of a neighboring apple tree. The overshadowing and competition for light and resources have led to the apple tree developing a poor and unbalanced form, which could result in its eventual decline if not addressed. We acknowledge that our previous application for a more severe reduction of the Silver Birch tree was refused last year. Based on the feedback received, we have reassessed the situation and are now proposing a specification that aligns with appropriate arboricultural practices	Granted	0
6/2024/1333/TC	1 x Silver Birch to reduce by approximately 2.5m height and 1.5m in width due to substantial lateral growth	No Objection	0
6/2023/0997/TC	T1 x Silver birch to reduce by 4m in height and 2m in width	Objection	0
6/2023/0996/EMT	1 x Silver birch to reduce by 4m in height and 2m in width	Refused	0
W6/2015/1503/TE	Removal of Conifer tree	Granted
N6/2008/1376/TE	REMOVAL OF SILVERY BIRCH	Deemed Refusal

There are no NMAs associated with this application