Return to search results   -   Start a new search

Appeal: 6/2019/1490/EM


Estate Management Appeal

Delegated

1 Youngs Rise Welwyn Garden City AL8 6RT

Enlargement of existing hardstanding to create permeable block paving hardstanding with alterations to boundary treatment to include second access and crossover

Estate Management Appeals Panel
03/10/2019
10/10/2019
07/11/2019

Mr Duncan Craig

Mr D Craig

61 New Road Digswell Welwyn AL6 0AL

61 New Road Digswell Welwyn AL6 0AL


Handside


Organisation Name Sent Reply Due Reply Received
Welwyn Hatfield Borough Council Councillor Anthony Dennis 18/02/2020 07/11/2019
Welwyn Hatfield Borough Council Councillor Fiona Thomson 18/02/2020 07/11/2019
Welwyn Hatfield Borough Council Councillor Siobhan Elam 18/02/2020 07/11/2019
Hertfordshire County Council Hertfordshire Transport Programmes & Strategy 18/02/2020 07/11/2019
Address Date Notified
100 Handside Lane Welwyn Garden City AL8 6SW
2 Youngs Rise Welwyn Garden City AL8 6RU
3 Youngs Rise Welwyn Garden City AL8 6RT
4 Youngs Rise Welwyn Garden City AL8 6RU

Appeal Dismissed
26/02/2020

If any documents do not appear to be shown below, please email planning@welhat.gov.uk including the case number. We will endeavour to publish any missing items within 10 working days.

To download a selection of individual documents place a tick alongside each of the relevant rows and then click on Download selected files. To download all of the documents place a tick in the box alongside the header row and all of the files will be selected, then click on Download selected files. To view individual documents click on the File for the required row.

Select All File Description Date Uploaded
Appeal Decision(s)
Appeal Decision EM Appelant_620191490EM.doc (240 kb) Appeal Decision EM Appelant 02/03/2020
Appeal Decision EM Appelant_620191490EM.pdf (13 kb) Appeal Decision EM AppelantPDF 02/03/2020
Application Number Proposal Decision Distance
6/2019/1490/EM Enlargement of existing hardstanding to create permeable block paving hardstanding with alterations to boundary treatment to include second access and crossover Refused